Closed michaelbeaumont closed 3 years ago
@michaelbeaumont All tests contain validation checks, so these will obviously fail now.
I know that I have set "strict" constraints. My (probably biased) assumption was, that negative IDs don't really make sense. I realize this may not be an absolute truth, so thanks for removing those constraints.
In the v2.0.1 implementation I already decided to take these out and keep it simple.
I totally agree it doesn't make sense. Unfortunately the 1.6 spec is quite underspecified in a number of instances, which leads to some vendors doing things like having reservationId = -1
to mean no reservationId
.
I totally agree it doesn't make sense. Unfortunately the 1.6 spec is quite underspecified in a number of instances, which leads to some vendors doing things like having
reservationId = -1
to mean noreservationId
.
Which is funny imho, since:
no reservation ID
valueIn any case -> merged
Some constraints were too strict