Open ThePokerDude opened 6 months ago
[Event ""] [Site ""] [Date ""] [Board "23"] [Dealer "W"] [Vulnerable "All"] [Deal "W:J83.KQJ8.9854.T4 K754.A94.KJ7.A95 AQ62.76.A3.KQ872 T9.T532.QT62.J63"] [Scoring ""] [BCFlags "1f"] [Generator "BridgeComposer Version 5.104.1"] {PAR of the deal: 3S = played by east: 140 points} {Feasability: 4 6 6 4 6 8 7 7 9 7 4 6 5 4 6 8 7 7 9 7 [South "WBridge5"] [West "ben0308p5dd"] [North "WBridge5"] [East "ben0308p5dd"] [Declarer "N"] [Contract "1NTX"] [Result "8"] {PAR of the deal: 3S = played by east: 140 points} {Feasability: 4 6 6 4 6 8 7 7 9 7 4 6 5 4 6 8 7 7 9 7} [Auction "W"] Pass 1NT X Pass Pass Pass [Play "E"] CK c3 C4 ca DA d2 D5 dk CQ c6 CT c5 C8 cj H8 c9 D3 d6 D9 dj S2 dt D8 d7 S6 dq D4 s5 SA st S8 s7 C7 h2 S3 h9 C2 ht SJ h4 SQ s9 HK sk H7 h3 HQ ha H6 h5 HJ s4
The BEN reasoning here is
Now we have only 20 visible samples, but it seems partner has SK most of the times.
We have 2 tricks, and 2 in clubs, so winning SQ, we will probably have to give declarer 2 Heart-tricks at the end. By using SA we might set up a squeeze against declarer.
So should we trust the neural network or go for the 7th trick?
The key to this deal is to introduce signaling, so West at the third club can deny interest in spades.
Ben can win the trick with Qs but wins with As instead