Open StefanoBalocco opened 8 years ago
Well, after more than 2 years I open a new ticket for the same idea: substitute underscore with lodash (ref. #166 ). The original ticket was closed without any test (ref. #196 ).
In those two years something changed, lodash and underscore merged effort in lodash: https://github.com/jashkenas/underscore/issues/2182 https://github.com/underdash/underdash/issues/14
I suppose that now is quite more interesting to swap the dependency (or, at least, create a nedb-lodash package).
I think it is time to move undersocre to lodash.
Or just write the methods and not depend on another dependency.
Well, after more than 2 years I open a new ticket for the same idea: substitute underscore with lodash (ref. #166 ). The original ticket was closed without any test (ref. #196 ).
In those two years something changed, lodash and underscore merged effort in lodash: https://github.com/jashkenas/underscore/issues/2182 https://github.com/underdash/underdash/issues/14
I suppose that now is quite more interesting to swap the dependency (or, at least, create a nedb-lodash package).