Open louisjoety opened 1 week ago
This is a PlantUML Diagramming Tool limitation, and according to the course website under "UML notation variations", can be rejected.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement:
While it’s true that it is negligible under UML notation variations, the dev team should still acknowledge that these differences can hinder readers' understanding and slow readers (like me) down during the PE due to the obstructions they introduce especially given the short amount of time (30 minutes) to identify documentation bugs. I think it should still be raised to the dev team so that future users will be able to read the documentation much more easily.
Moreover, if the team deems it to be a PlantUML Diagramming Tool limitation, perhaps stating it as a disclaimer in the DG would provide greater clarity. Since the PlantUML Diagramming Tool is not mandatory for all teams, not everyone will be familiar with its limitations. Additionally, during the PE, testers would not have the time to determine whether an issue is due to the tool’s limitations or an actual bug. This would ensure that the limitations are made clear to me so that I am not led to believe that it is a documentation bug since the dev team has acknowledged it before the PE.
Lastly, if the issue lies with PlantUML, switching to another platform could be a simple and effective workaround.
The notes are being overlapped by the arrows across the DG, while this can be purely cosmetic however it occurs multiple times across the DG, hence the severity will be slightly raised as a result beyond just cosmetics.