Open felix021 opened 1 month ago
Issue 4687 mentioned Certificate transparency monitor but it's not quite convenient to deploy two services and maintain the list separately.
Certificate transparency monitor
Other
Some certificates are valid according to Kuma, but violate the RFC 6962 Certificate Transparency policy, which is not allowed to continue on Chrome.
Refer to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6962 for details on this policy.
Support RFC 6962 validation on certificates.
No response
📑 I have found these related issues/pull requests
Issue 4687 mentioned
Certificate transparency monitorbut it's not quite convenient to deploy two services and maintain the list separately.🏷️ Feature Request Type
Other
🔖 Feature description
Some certificates are valid according to Kuma, but violate the RFC 6962 Certificate Transparency policy, which is not allowed to continue on Chrome.
Refer to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6962 for details on this policy.
✔️ Solution
Support RFC 6962 validation on certificates.
❓ Alternatives
No response
📝 Additional Context
No response