Open codeagencybe opened 2 years ago
Why would you not like to expose the naming convention to the status page? I don't quite understand why this is something that would be valuable.
Rationale: Public Status pages should only be a subset of all monitors, most likely the ones which are relevant for the end-users
@CommanderStorm Here are more reasons to have this feature:
Some of the use cases could be realized by using monitor tags. However, they are not always practical. As I understand it, tags are meant to be used in multiple monitors. If additional information is to be added to only one monitor, it does not make sense to create tags only for this one monitor.
Sounds reasonable.
PRs adding such functionality should add it to this modal:
which currently holds this content:
Here is our contribution guide: https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
⚠️ Please verify that this feature request has NOT been suggested before.
🏷️ Feature Request Type
UI Feature
🔖 Feature description
Add a seperate field for internal or public name for a test on the statuspage. Sometimes one wants to add a test and visible on the public status page, but we don't want to show the same internal name we give to eg the server. Or the server has internally a name convention I don't want to expose to public.
✔️ Solution
Having a seperate name or public label or something that is used for the statuspage would be nice. When adding a new test, the "statuspage name/label" is optional. If you don't use it, it uses the same value as the test name. If you do use it, the status page will show that specific value.
❓ Alternatives
No response
📝 Additional Context
No response