louking
commented
3 years ago Tests
| race | date |
|---|---|
| earlier | 2/4/21 |
| later | 2/5/21 |
make sure ages cross division boundary (5 year divisions)
| result name | race | age |
|---|---|---|
| Test Nonmember | earlier | 44 |
| Test Nonmember | later | 45 |
| Testero Nonmember | earlier | 44 |
| Testero Nonmember | later | 45 |
- [x] brand new nonmember (assume real birthdate on date of "later" race)
- [x] nonmember with exact name result for later race
- [x] nonmember with exact name result for earlier race
- [x] clear results for both races
- [x] nonmember with exact name result for earlier race
- [x] nonmember with exact name result for later race
- [x] clear results for later race
- [x] nonmember with similar name result for later race
- [x] clear results for earlier race
- [x] nonmember with similar name result for earlier race
Along with #171, there's the need to support a large body of nonmembers. This is because the use case for proportional scoring is for the Maryland/DC RRCA Grand Prix, and there are no "members" per se. In particular, we don't know the date of birth for any of the participants.
We estimate the date of birth based on the earliest race of the year, counting back based in the age in the result. This can change after someone is added to the database, if racedate, age combination implies an earlier date of birth. E.g., consider the following results. The correct estimate for dob is 2/5/1978