Closed letonphat1988 closed 1 year ago
Sorry for the very late reply. Hi, I've taken a look at the fio template and the code, I don't see the issue. Can you show me somewhay what is going wrong?
I think it is a code mistake, @louwrentius you set a settings_copy but used the old workload setting.
I've processed your patch, so I consider this one fixed.
I saw the precondition's fio process was running base on runtime not on capacity which defined 100% in template. BTW precondition in my knowledge need one more 4K randwrite job
prefer document: https://github.com/intel/fiovisualizer/blob/master/Workloads/Precondition/SSD%20precondition.txt