Closed sjakobi closed 5 years ago
Why not make the upper bound on base
5
? I doubt very much anything could break severely enough in GHC 8.10 to warrant this library not building, and it avoids you having to do this bounds-related song-and-dance again in six months' time.
Maybe not in GHC 8.10, but I don't know about GHC 8.12. If no changes are needed for the next GHC version, I can make a Hackage revision in ~60s.
Since you (re-)wrote most of the code in this package, I've added you as an author @treeowl.
Thanks!
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019, 8:33 AM Simon Jakobi notifications@github.com wrote:
Since you (re-)wrote most of the code in this package, I've added you as an author @treeowl https://github.com/treeowl.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sjakobi/coercible-utils/pull/23?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAOOF7PTSO4XN654NBIPBEDQI6HYTA5CNFSM4IUPYZKKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD6K5LLI#issuecomment-529913261, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAOOF7NP2OCGF5NVBJG52HTQI6HYTANCNFSM4IUPYZKA .
Why not make the upper bound on base
5
? I doubt very much anything could break severely enough in GHC 8.10 to warrant this library not building, and it avoids you having to do this bounds-related song-and-dance again in six months' time.