use private CSI sequence for marking

🚀 Changes proposed by this PR

🔗 Related bug reports/feature requests

ISSUE: The ANSI CSI sequence used for marking should be a private one #19

🧰 Type of change

[✔ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).

Use private CSI sequence instead of the already defined CBT CSI sequence.

Fixes #19

📝 Notes to reviewer

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_escape_code#CSI_(Control_Sequence_Introducer)_sequences

"A subset of arrangements was declared "private" so that terminal manufacturers could insert their own sequences without conflicting with the standard. Sequences containing the parameter bytes <=>? or the final bytes 0x70–0x7E (p–z{|}~) are private. "

https://www.ecma-international.org/wp-content/uploads/ECMA-48_5th_edition_june_1991.pdf

5.4.d) F is the Final Byte; it consists of a bit combination from 04/00 to 07/14; it terminates the control sequence and together with the Intermediate Bytes, if present, identifies the control function.

Bit combinations 07/00 to 07/14 are available as Final Bytes of control sequences for private (or experimental) use.

5.4 Table 3: ("Z" = column 05, row 10 -> "CBT")

https://vt100.net/docs/vt510-rm/chapter4.html (search for "CBT)

🤝 Requirements

[✔ ] ✍ I have read and agree to this projects Code of Conduct.
[✔ ] ✍ I have read and agree to this projects Contribution Guidelines.
[✔ ] ✍ I have read and agree to the Developer Certificate of Origin.
[ ✔] 🔎 I have performed a self-review of my own changes.
[ ✔] 🎨 My changes follow the style guidelines of this project.
[ ] 💬 My changes as properly commented, primarily for hard-to-understand areas.
[ ] 📝 I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
[ ] 🧪 I have included tests (if necessary) for this change.

lrstanley / bubblezone