Open pvlov opened 4 months ago
I don't know if you consider this as a feature or bug, so I'll attach both labels for now. If this UX is by choice, I would love to hear the reasoning behind your choice of breaking the pattern Applications usually adhere to.
This should be an easy change and therefore warrant the good first issue
label but I'll let the you, the Artemis Maintainers, decide if it is applicable.
Thanks for your feedback. We really appreciate it!
This was done by choice because of the following reasons:
we have a dedicated edit in editor feature when you want to change the code of those repos online. With the review changes button, you can compare template vs solution repository
most instructors prefer to edit the repos locally in their own IDE
Opening the readonly online code editor is not done often
we want to reduce the clutter on the page with too many button
we want to have a consistent experience with other pages that show repositories
@rabeatwork is currently re-designing this dialog to make it more appealing.
Is there a specific reason why you want to open those repos in the readonly code editor? If we understand this better, we can potentially come up with a better solution for you.
Thanks for the quick reply! It is great to hear about Artemis's dedication to improving the UX of Artemis.
My concerns mainly stem from my experience working with Artemis as a tutor, so I can only really speak about it in that capacity. My main gripe with cloning the repository, is that I need to clone it. Depending on the Exercise, this can take no time at all e.g. some small OCaml exercise such as in the course FPV but can also take quite a lot of time (due to indexing etc.) if we consider larger exercises like the ones in a course like EIST.
Here are some of the situations I have encountered in my usual workflow as a tutor:
After a working period in my tutorial I want to talk about the different approaches my student took/could take and want to have the model solution on my other screen as a reference. I don't want to actually interact with the solution but just have it open on the side to be able to see what the instructors thought would be the best solution. Sometimes the solution even contains multiple approaches making it very handy to have as a reference.
If a student has problems with the template or just questions about it, I want to be able to check the template quickly to be able to accurately answer the question of the student or clarify something by referencing the exact wording/code snippet in the template.
When a student encounters problems due to tests failing, I often want to reference both the student submission as well as the test repository to see if there is an actual problem with the tests or if the student made a mistake that makes the tests behave weirdly.
If a student asks me a question about their specific approach, it is much easier to check the implementation via Artemis on my device than physically going to the student or using some kind of screen share in online tutorials.
This annoyance is often mitigated by the fact that most instructors have the repositories cloned anyway but for tutors, that only want to quickly consume the content of the model solution or a students code, cloning and then immediately deleting the respective repository is rather unpleasant.
"1. we have a dedicated edit in editor feature when you want to change the code of those repos online. With the review changes button, you can compare template vs solution repository"
The Review Changes
button is only really practical to use when the git diff
is small, for bigger exercises involving multiple files, a dedicated file explorer is more practical.
Regarding 2. and 3., I guess this is personal preference.
"4. we want to reduce the clutter on the page with too many button"
I think after this issue about customising the Open In
config is processed, this should not be a problem anymore and having a choice between viewing online and cloning will feel very obvious and concise.
"5. we want to have a consistent experience with other pages that show repositories"
I have only seen the same dialogue in the participation
tab, where the same issues apply. Are there any more pages where I could check the behaviour?
Is your feature request related to a problem?
When you want to view the {Template | Solution | Test }-repository inside of an Artemis course as a tutor through its builtin code editor, you are presented with this window:
The way to open the code editor is to now click on the symbol on the right of the link, which is very unintuitive since other applications e.g. GitHub, GitLab use this element to copy the link. Also without any description, there is no way to know what this button will do, as the only information provided is the fact that it is outbound.
Describe the solution you'd like
The
Copy URL
button should swap the logic with the small button next to the link.Describe alternatives you've considered
You could keep the functionality as is, but add a hover-text that says something along the lines of "Click here to open in the Editor"
Additional context
To replicate and see this window, go to a coding exercise of a course, click on
view
in thetutor actions
bar and then scroll down until you see the different buttons for the repositories.