Open amattsmith opened 3 years ago
Well, it really depends on your infrastructure. I never tried HA configs so I'm using the basic standalone.xml
config. Here are the relevant snippets for my local dev VM (prod has a different setup):
<server>
...
<profile>
...
<subsystem xmlns="urn:jboss:domain:undertow:12.0" default-server="default-server" default-virtual-host="default-host" default-servlet-container="default" default-security-domain="other" statistics-enabled="${wildfly.undertow.statistics-enabled:${wildfly.statistics-enabled:false}}">
<buffer-cache name="default"/>
<server name="default-server">
<http-listener name="default" socket-binding="http" redirect-socket="https" enable-http2="true"/>
<https-listener name="https" socket-binding="https" security-realm="ApplicationRealm" enable-http2="true"/>
<https-listener name="https_cns" socket-binding="https_cns" security-realm="ApplicationRealm" verify-client="REQUESTED" enable-http2="true"/>
<host name="default-host" alias="localhost">
<location name="/" handler="welcome-content"/>
<http-invoker security-realm="ApplicationRealm"/>
</host>
</server>
<servlet-container name="default">
<jsp-config/>
<websockets/>
</servlet-container>
<handlers>
<file name="welcome-content" path="${jboss.home.dir}/welcome-content"/>
</handlers>
</subsystem>
<subsystem xmlns="urn:jboss:domain:weld:4.0"/>
</profile>
<interfaces>
<interface name="management">
<inet-address value="${jboss.bind.address.management:127.0.0.1}"/>
</interface>
<interface name="public">
<inet-address value="${jboss.bind.address:127.0.0.1}"/>
</interface>
</interfaces>
<socket-binding-group name="standard-sockets" default-interface="public" port-offset="${jboss.socket.binding.port-offset:0}">
<socket-binding name="ajp" port="${jboss.ajp.port:8009}"/>
<socket-binding name="http" port="${jboss.http.port:8085}"/>
<socket-binding name="https" port="${jboss.https.port:8443}"/>
<socket-binding name="https_cns" port="8444"/>
<socket-binding name="management-http" interface="management" port="${jboss.management.http.port:9990}"/>
<socket-binding name="management-https" interface="management" port="${jboss.management.https.port:9993}"/>
<socket-binding name="txn-recovery-environment" port="4712"/>
<socket-binding name="txn-status-manager" port="4713"/>
<outbound-socket-binding name="mail-smtp">
<remote-destination host="localhost" port="25"/>
</outbound-socket-binding>
</socket-binding-group>
...
</server>
Basically, I am forcing the client certificate request for incoming requests on a specific, additional server port.
Any chance you could include the standalone-ha.xml configuration file you are using for the X509 config? Once I migrated from keycloak 11.* and began going down the path of writing my own custom code, I can't get chrome to prompt for the certificate. I believe it is due to my standalone-ha.xml configuration. Any chance you could share your's? Thanks in advance!