lsd-rs / lsd

The next gen ls command
Apache License 2.0
13.05k stars 425 forks source link

[Bug]: lsd -l and ls -l "do not provide the same information" #940

Open B0dre opened 10 months ago

B0dre commented 10 months ago

Expected behavior

If applicable, add the output of the classic ls command (\ls -l) in order to show the buggy file/directory.

Actual behavior

lsd -l and ls -l do not provide the same information. Specifically the total number of files and the number of files in each directory.

Please, take a look at the screenshot.

thanks guys.

screenshot
zwpaper commented 10 months ago

Thanks for the report, may i ask which version of ls did you use?

B0dre commented 10 months ago

This is (ls (GNU coreutils) 9.4)

zwpaper commented 10 months ago

got it, allow me to double confirm that the correct improvement should be adding the total XX and hard link numbers after the permission column, Do I understand right?

B0dre commented 10 months ago

Yes, exactly that is right