This is a very promising project that can be continually refined. I think this falls under the broader category of code evaluation, which includes assessing the complexity, quality, manpower, and cost of development, as well as various statistics about the code.
The open-source programs I frequently use in this area are:
sloccount (by David A. Wheeler),
tokei (by XAMPPRocky), and
cloc (by AlDanial).
Git-statistic software is more comprehensive than the aforementioned programs, providing more thorough analysis.
Git-statistic needs a top-level framework design that, in addition to Git projects, allows it to be compatible with projects managed by version control systems like SVN and CVS, and even support programs without version control.
Additionally, the language support should be designed as an open architecture so that besides English and Chinese, other languages can be easily added, facilitating future internationalization.
Git-statistic is worth a more better project name!
This is a very promising project that can be continually refined. I think this falls under the broader category of code evaluation, which includes assessing the complexity, quality, manpower, and cost of development, as well as various statistics about the code.
The open-source programs I frequently use in this area are: sloccount (by David A. Wheeler), tokei (by XAMPPRocky), and cloc (by AlDanial).
Git-statistic software is more comprehensive than the aforementioned programs, providing more thorough analysis.
Git-statistic needs a top-level framework design that, in addition to Git projects, allows it to be compatible with projects managed by version control systems like SVN and CVS, and even support programs without version control.
Additionally, the language support should be designed as an open architecture so that besides English and Chinese, other languages can be easily added, facilitating future internationalization.
Git-statistic is worth a more better project name!