Closed tfausak closed 3 years ago
Now there is a legitimate test failure against GHC 8.10. It's related to #48. I don't know enough to fix it.
src-literatetests/Main.hs:183:3:
1) regression issue 48 a
expected: Right
foo =
let a = b@1
cccc = ()
in foo
but got: Right
foo =
let a = _
cccc = ()
in foo
To rerun use: --match "/regression/issue 48 a/"
src-literatetests/Main.hs:183:3:
2) context free: regression issue 48 a
expected: Right
foo =
let
a = b@1
cccc = ()
in foo
but got: Right
foo =
let
a = _
cccc = ()
in foo
https://github.com/lspitzner/brittany/pull/324/checks?check_run_id=1403080234#step:7:1202
Now there is a legitimate test failure against GHC 8.10. It's related to #48. I don't know enough to fix it.
Looking at --dump-full-ast
from brittany with 8.8 and brittany with 8.10, we can see a difference:
where 8.8 returns:
[ A Just (Ann (DP (0,-1)) [] [] [] Nothing Nothing)
GRHS
NoExt
[]
A Just (Ann (DP (0,1)) [] [] [((G AnnAt),DP (0,0))] Nothing Nothing)
EAsPat
NoExt
A Just (Ann (DP (0,0)) [] [] [((G AnnVal),DP (0,0))] Nothing Nothing)
Unqual {OccName: b}
A Just (Ann (DP (0,0)) [] [] [((G AnnVal),DP (0,0))] Nothing Nothing)
HsOverLit
NoExt
OverLit
NoExt
HsIntegral
IL
SourceText "1"
False
1
HsLit
NoExt
HsString
SourceText "noExpr"
{FastString: "noExpr"}
]
8.10 returns a hole!
[ A Just (Ann (DP (0,-1)) [] [] [] Nothing Nothing)
GRHS
NoExtField
[]
A Just (Ann (DP (0,1)) [] [] [((G AnnVal),DP (0,0))] Nothing Nothing)
HsUnboundVar
NoExtField
TrueExprHole {OccName: _}
]
It's also not valid syntax as ghci tells us:
λ> b = a@()
<interactive>:3:5: error:
Pattern syntax in expression context: a@()
Type application syntax requires a space before '@'
I think it's fine to remove this test (or correct it so that it has the space before the @
)
It's surprising to me that the AST can even represent this, although perhaps it's useful for error messages or something
or correct it so that it has the space before the
@
👍
Need to update the supported GHC versions in the readme
I should make sure there are stack.yaml
files for each configuration. Then I think this will be ready to go.
@tfausak would you like any help with this release?
Sorry! Thanks for the ping. I don't need any help with this, I just have to actually do it. With any luck I should be able to spend some time on it in the next few days.
Continuing work from #312.