Closed beckynevin closed 6 months ago
Hi @MelissaGraham , thanks for the comments! So far I've made some changes:
@MelissaGraham , completed my to do list, this is ready for another look-over by you. I offered more guidance in part 3 for manifest file creation. Do you think it's contradictory to say "PIs are welcome to create their own manifest file. This is not the recommended option for PIs new to the citizen science pipeline."
Also, I think we need a better name for this notebook before we officially merge to main. Citizen_Science_Testing.ipynb
makes it seem like it's still in development. The name should tell a user what the notebook does (send images to Zooniverse) and the name should also demonstrate the order to run the notebooks in (that this one should be run first).
What about 01_Introduction_to_Citsci_Pipeline.ipynb
? We could name the variable_stars notebook something like 02_Send_Flipbook_Variable_Stars_Imaging.ipynb
. Thoughts? @MelissaGraham @clareh @ericdrosas87 @bnord
@MelissaGraham , completed my to do list, this is ready for another look-over by you. I offered more guidance in part 3 for manifest file creation. Do you think it's contradictory to say "PIs are welcome to create their own manifest file. This is not the recommended option for PIs new to the citizen science pipeline."
Yes that sounds reasonable. It's not recommended b/c it's a little harder, yeah?
Also, I think we need a better name for this notebook before we officially merge to main.
Citizen_Science_Testing.ipynb
makes it seem like it's still in development. The name should tell a user what the notebook does (send images to Zooniverse) and the name should also demonstrate the order to run the notebooks in (that this one should be run first).What about
01_Introduction_to_Citsci_Pipeline.ipynb
? We could name the variable_stars notebook something like02_Send_Flipbook_Variable_Stars_Imaging.ipynb
. Thoughts? @MelissaGraham @clareh @ericdrosas87 @bnord
"01_Introduction_to ...", classic standard, that'll work fine, IMO.
Hi all, I'm making this a PR to get some feedback on whether the current notebook meets RTN045 requirements. I did my best to go through and make changes after the accessibility notebook workshop. I'd love to get your 2cents on what we can further improve.
https://rtn-045.lsst.io/