Via https://github.com/lsst-sqre/strimzi-registry-operator/issues/77#issuecomment-1333324699 its clear it'd be useful for the StrimziSchemaRegistry resource to be more explicit about the Kafka cluster it was related to. Right now the cluster name is gleaned from the StrimziUser's annotation. It would be less magical, and therefore easier to debug, if this configuration was more explicit on the StrimziSchemaRegistry itself. For example:
Potentially the KafkaUser should even be configured explicitly too, rather than being the same name as the StrimziSchemaRegistry resource. I'm not aware of an annotation for this; potentially it could be a configuration (in the spec) instead.
Via https://github.com/lsst-sqre/strimzi-registry-operator/issues/77#issuecomment-1333324699 its clear it'd be useful for the StrimziSchemaRegistry resource to be more explicit about the Kafka cluster it was related to. Right now the cluster name is gleaned from the StrimziUser's annotation. It would be less magical, and therefore easier to debug, if this configuration was more explicit on the StrimziSchemaRegistry itself. For example:
Potentially the KafkaUser should even be configured explicitly too, rather than being the same name as the StrimziSchemaRegistry resource. I'm not aware of an annotation for this; potentially it could be a configuration (in the
spec
) instead.