Open SamuelMarks opened 2 years ago
In Python I can do this:
class_reduction_v2 = ClassDef( name="ReductionV2", bases=[], keywords=[], body=[ Expr(value=set_value("foo")), Assign(targets=[Name(id="AUTO", ctx=Store())], value=set_value("auto")), Assign(targets=[Name(id="NONE", ctx=Store())], value=set_value("none")), Assign(targets=[Name(id="SUM", ctx=Store())], value=set_value("sum")), Assign( targets=[Name(id="SUM_OVER_BATCH_SIZE", ctx=Store())], value=set_value("sum_over_batch_size"), ), ], decorator_list=[], )
Which produces:
class ReductionV2: """ foo """ AUTO = 'auto' NONE = 'none' SUM = 'sum' SUM_OVER_BATCH_SIZE = 'sum_over_batch_size'
Looks like neither LLVM LibTooling nor LLVM libclang have support for this: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/create-and-emit-ast-for-struct-clang-recorddecl/61383
Is this something you would consider adding to Psyche-C? 🥇
Hi @SamuelMarks . I wouldn't implement such a feature myself, but I'd be willing to accept it as a contribution (if the implementation doesn't cause side effects for the main use of psyche-c's AST).
In Python I can do this:
Which produces:
Looks like neither LLVM LibTooling nor LLVM libclang have support for this: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/create-and-emit-ast-for-struct-clang-recorddecl/61383
Is this something you would consider adding to Psyche-C? 🥇