NaN not recognized

[srearl]

NaN is not recognized as a missing value code in Copy of saddferb_1.ts.data even though it is listed in the key file NWT_snow_fence_soilC_Key_Key_KEY_V2

[wwieder]

I'm inclined to just change this manually in the raw data & replace NaN's with a numeric value (-9999) to see if this fixes the problem. You OK with this @srearl?

[srearl]

Will - Not sure that we need to do anything about this, really, except that I should probably change the type of agb from char to double in the tarball since that is an artifact, mostly just need to figure out why the script missed this.

[wwieder]

OK, let me know if I can do anything to help.

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 11:31 AM StevanEarl notifications@github.com wrote:

Will - Not sure that we need to do anything about this, really, except that I should probably change the type of agb from char to double in the tarball since that is an artifact, mostly just need to figure out why the script missed this.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/srearl/soilHarmonization/issues/29?email_source=notifications&email_token=AB5IWJDYZ33WJUKGXEJXVBTQLJFHFA5CNFSM4IZTYVYKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD7PFLEQ#issuecomment-534664594, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB5IWJBCPZ3EGIWE6MT463TQLJFHFANCNFSM4IZTYVYA .

-- Will Wieder Project Scientist CGD, NCAR 303-497-1352

[srearl]

It is unclear what happened here as the identification of NaN as NA per the key file for this data set worked appropriately in follow-up testing. As a result, and only because of this, the NaN values in Copy of saddferb_1_HMGZD were manually edited to NA.