ltm-erlangen / deal.ii-qc

quasi-continuum approach implemented using deal.II library
GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1
1 stars 0 forks source link

Should we write theory and implementation details in markdown format? #143

Open bodduv opened 7 years ago

bodduv commented 7 years ago

Recently I have been looking through markdown and how it got popular. I have also looked through something called github pages through which we can generate site for github projects. I see that there are many advantages of using markdown for writing theory and implementation details (inside doc folder):

One main attraction is that Github pages can use markdown documentation to generate website (hosted by github itself) with ease.

davydden commented 7 years ago

I would just stick with doxygen which also supports math symbols, separate standalone pages etc.

For now I would not bother much until we have something published on the topic.

bodduv commented 7 years ago

I think we should keep doxygen documentation inline with code. I am talking about the theory.tex file we have in doc folder.

davydden commented 7 years ago

Eventually I would switch it to an additional page in doxygen, which can be linked to from the home page.

davydden commented 7 years ago

*home/main index.html page of doxygen