Open snim2 opened 9 years ago
This would be helpful for myself and my colleagues as well. Additionally, it would also be helpful for commandline options to have clearly documented default values.
As an addendum to this, can I ask if the following can be explained or fixed if it is indeed a typo?
the mean is reported at a 95% confidence level (
-c 99
).
Surely -c 95
would give 95% confidence level? or you'd need -c 100
as well as -n 100
to have even the slimmest semblance of confidence in n% range?
The confidence interval code is, as far as I can remember (and @snim2 might know more!) slightly unfinished.