Hi Luca,
Big fan of crispresso and very much looking forward to crispresso 2.
I was running a batch of crispressos and I came across a few wells that seems to have a usually high amount of unmodified reads. When i looked at the alleles around the predicted cut side they appeared to have clear deletions but were counted as unmodified in every statistic.
I'm not sure why it CRISPresso could be counting these reads as unmodified. I think there is the same thing in the reads in the left-aligning option issue where the reads have deletions but are counted as unedited.
Hi Luca, Big fan of crispresso and very much looking forward to crispresso 2. I was running a batch of crispressos and I came across a few wells that seems to have a usually high amount of unmodified reads. When i looked at the alleles around the predicted cut side they appeared to have clear deletions but were counted as unmodified in every statistic.
Aligned_Sequence Reference_Sequence Unedited %Reads #Reads AGTGGAGGATGCCTTCT--ACGTTGGTGCGTGAGATCCGG AGTGGAGGATGCCTTCTACACGTTGGTGCGTGAGATCCGG True 61.50844322453524 103082 GATGCCTTC-ACATGTCTCACGTTGGTGCGTGAGATCCGG GATGCCTTCTA-------CACGTTGGTGCGTGAGATCCGG True 35.92815800465359 60212 AGTGGAGGATGCCTTCT----------------------- AGTGGAGGATGCCTTCTACACGTTGGTGCGTGAGATCCGG False 0.6533802732859946 1095
I'm not sure why it CRISPresso could be counting these reads as unmodified. I think there is the same thing in the reads in the left-aligning option issue where the reads have deletions but are counted as unedited.
Any help would be deeply appreciated.
Thanks,
Alexander Raeside Oxford Genetics