Closed khatriafaz closed 2 years ago
Hey, @khatriafaz! Thanks for reporting the bug and bringing a solution! I added a test case to cover this scenario and I'm gonna publish a release right now! 🚀
Merging #41 (3f87699) into develop (f01a850) will increase coverage by
0.01%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #41 +/- ##
=============================================
+ Coverage 98.23% 98.24% +0.01%
Complexity 150 150
=============================================
Files 26 26
Lines 509 512 +3
=============================================
+ Hits 500 503 +3
Misses 9 9
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/Models/Concerns/HasSubscriptions.php | 95.76% <100.00%> (+0.06%) |
:arrow_up: |
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.
@lucasdotvin thanks for considering my solution.
The issue is that when a feature ticket is assigned to the subscriber, and if there are more than 1 subscriber for the same ticket, the package loads the balance as summed up for all the feature tickets.
The whereHas has the scope for who is the subscriber, but the with misses the scope, and because of that, when the feature tickets for a particular feature is loaded, it loaded summed up charges for the tickets assigned to anyone.
Example:
I assign 5 charges as a feature ticket when a user confirms their account:
So this happens for each user who registered and confirmed their account.
Now when we see how much balance for each user has using:
If the system has only 1 user, it will return 5.
If there are more than one users, say n users, it will return 5 * n.