d7415
commented
3 years ago Moving to .com would be simpler because the configuration should be identical. Their OSS credits system is a pain though. That said, one batch of credits would probably last this project a while as I think it's usually 10,000.
Like you say, up to @scheibler though.
lucc
travis-ci.org was finally shut down (blog entry) and if we want to continue using travis we have to use travis-ci.com
Our old builds are still on org but the newest one is already failing: https://travis-ci.org/github/scheibler/khard/builds And new PRs won't get build.
Solutions
@scheibler I need your help with either solution as I do not have enough access rights on this repo to d it alone. We might prefer travis as we can use our current config with that. We might not prefer github actions because we have to set up a new config, but we might prefer GA because there is less fiddling around with access right and github-apps and accounts.
I have switched to travis-ci.com for lucc/nvimpager and have used github actions for my master thesis, so I am fine with either one, I just want to have CI :)