Closed kenghuang closed 4 years ago
Why this issue is closed? I couldn't find any benchmark at all. @alanw
@mdianjun back in time I used it was a huge performance difference but I do not have benchmarks. maybe have a look at https://github.com/tantivy-search/tantivy they implement a search in rust and do have good performance. if rust or a binding to rust is acceptable for your task of cause. if so you will find benchmarks here: https://tantivy-search.github.io/bench/ are much bigger community I guess.
@mdianjun back in time I used it was a huge performance difference but I do not have benchmarks. maybe have a look at https://github.com/tantivy-search/tantivy they implement a search in rust and do have good performance. if rust or a binding to rust is acceptable for your task of cause. if so you will find benchmarks here: https://tantivy-search.github.io/bench/ are much bigger community I guess.
@keywan-ghadami Thank you, I have been comparing tantivy and lucene++ for several days. Tantivy community is bigger and more active, but the defect of it is the limitation of query grammar, which only supports phrase query and logical expression query, lacking of more complex queries, e.g. fuzzy query, range query. So I am confused.
LucenePlusPlus is good,but we can not get a performance test data or benchmark with lucene?