Closed cope closed 7 years ago
Hey @cope,
I think isn't a good idea to use the latest version of waterline-sequel because we need these PR's: #17, #67.
I noticed that the waterline-sequel is going to be replaced for waterline-sql-builder, so I think the best approach is migrate to waterline-sql-builder instead waterline-sequel...
Ok, so then I will submit my waterline-sequel PR to your fork and then see what happens with waterline-sql-builder down the line...
Is that OK?
Hi @lucianmachado,
I created the pull request for your fork of waterline-sequel: https://github.com/lucianmachado/waterline-sequel/pull/1
Please take a look and approve if it is OK :)
@cope I'll check asap, thanks!
Hey @lucianmachado,
Can we remove the waterline-sequel 0.5.0 from the dependencies and use the latest version of it?
We have submitted a fix that is supposed to go into the 0.6.5 and with this hard dependency on 0.5.0, our fix will not be available.