luckybird1994 / ASAM

82 stars 8 forks source link

Can you explain why EfficientSAM performed better than the original SAM in the experimental part of the paper? #5

Open erliufashi opened 4 months ago

erliufashi commented 4 months ago

Thank you for your very valuable work. Can you explain why EfficientSAM performed better than the original SAM in the experimental part of the paper? In the official paper of EfficientSAM, as a lightweight vit model, the performance of EfficientSAM is lower than that of the original SAM. However, in your paper, EfficientSAM is overall better than SAM. Does this involve evaluation methods not mentioned in the paper?

luckybird1994 commented 4 months ago

In our paper, we use sam-base; While the paper EfficientSAM uses the sam-huge. We think this is may be one reason. Thanks!

erliufashi commented 4 months ago

Thanks for your reply. Whether in EfficientSAM's paper or the official repository https://github.com/yformer/EfficientSAM, the model versions used by EfficientSAM are ViT-tiny and ViT-small, which are smaller than the sam-base. So if your work uses EfficientSAM with larger checkpoints from other toollibraries, can you tell me? This is very helpful to my work, thank you very much!

luckybird1994 commented 4 months ago

OK! Thank you for your interest in our work.