Check out the connected issue for screenshots. Instead of removing Lucky::Action.with, I set up the function to require the expected arguments the same way as Lucky::Action.route which then calls route with them. This means it is not a breaking change.
I did remove the compiler error if you call Lucky::Action.with with no arguments. You get an error that doesn't actually point you to where you called it.
Resolves #1637
Check out the connected issue for screenshots. Instead of removing
Lucky::Action.with
, I set up the function to require the expected arguments the same way asLucky::Action.route
which then callsroute
with them. This means it is not a breaking change.I did remove the compiler error if you call
Lucky::Action.with
with no arguments. You get an error that doesn't actually point you to where you called it.