Closed AdamISZ closed 8 years ago
It seems some assumptions were invalidated in the latest libsecp256k1, which resulted in this build failure.
Aside from that, would be against naming these functions as tweak_mul, tweak_add and add both of them to PrivateKey and PublicKey? That would be more inline with other functions.
Renaming: of course, no problem. Adding others: for adding pubkeys there is already combine(), right? For privkey_tweak_mul; sure, haven't really thought about it - didn't have a need for it myself.
Yes, PublicKey.combine is there already.
Let me know if you're planning to send an updated PR with these changes, thanks.
Hi, sure, but I was just going to ask you: should I wait until the build is fixed? Otherwise I'll just resubmit with the names changed, is that OK?
Since that comment the build has been fixed and the newer sig compact serialization functions and sig normalized have been exposed. IOW: the build is fine, please proceed :)
??
I'm also interested on this, is it being closed for a new PR or should I do it?
Gimme a second :) Yes, new PR.
See #1