Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
The value is calculated and not actually read! Please always keep in mind that
the parser interprets the boxes. It may show things that are actually not in
the file.
Original comment by Sebastian.Annies
on 10 Jul 2011 at 7:47
sorry - I misunderstood your comment.
The default value is 0. But there is no value! 0 is just the default. I just
changed it to -1 to make clear that there is no value
Original comment by Sebastian.Annies
on 10 Jul 2011 at 8:03
Hi Sebastian, thanks for looking into this.
I am not sure that I fully understand what you mean by "there is no value". The
flags are 11, both baseDataOffset and defaultSampleSize are present. I am
using isoviewer-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar to look at the file now and it looks fine. In
other words isoviewer-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar works pretty much as expected. It seems
it displays all fields regardless of the flags.
Original comment by hz01...@gmail.com
on 10 Jul 2011 at 9:03
The Object has a field 'defaultSampleSize'. The type of the field is 'long'. I
cannot make the value disappear. The field always contains a value and by
default '0'. I could switch to 'Long' to have the possibility to put a 'null'
into the field but I think it's ok to have a '-1' to represent 'no value
available'.
Original comment by Sebastian.Annies
on 11 Jul 2011 at 6:42
Sebastian, I think there is some misunderstanding or miscommunication here.
What I meant is the following:
When the flags are 11, the following should be present:
1. baseDataOffset
2. defaultSampleSize
The other fields such as defaultSampleDuration should not be present.
The original version of isoviewer does NOT show baseDataOffset,
defaultSampleSize, but shows defaultSampleDuration. I thought this is incorrect.
isoviewer-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar shows baseDataOffset, defaultSampleSize correclty,
and shows 0 for other fields such as defaultSampleDuration. I think this is
not desirable, but it is OK if someone knows that 0 may mean the field is not
present.
Original comment by hz01...@gmail.com
on 11 Jul 2011 at 9:10
I'm not going to change anything here but will accept patches.
Original comment by Sebastian.Annies
on 5 Sep 2011 at 10:27
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
hz01...@gmail.com
on 25 Jun 2011 at 12:35Attachments: