Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
In FirstTargetRangeProperty.java try increasing the distance tolerance value
slightly.
[code]
Index: FirstTargetRangeProperty.java
===================================================================
--- FirstTargetRangeProperty.java (revision 150)
+++ FirstTargetRangeProperty.java (working copy)
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
}
}
//tolerance
- distance += 1.5;
+ distance += 2;
//testing new firsttargetrangeproperty
if ((float) (MathUtil.getDistance(effector, firstTarget)) <= distance) {
[/code]
Original comment by ZeroSign...@gmail.com
on 10 Mar 2011 at 3:37
Attachments:
Original comment by ZeroSign...@gmail.com
on 10 Mar 2011 at 4:04
Hm.. thank you for help i test it. Strange you not add this fix to trunk, why?
:)
Original comment by to...@mail.com
on 10 Mar 2011 at 11:34
I change to 2.5, not help, still problem.
Original comment by to...@mail.com
on 11 Mar 2011 at 8:58
i try change for 5m and what i see, looks like we miss :) Because i try use
skill ID-169 you going to 0m to target and use it.
Second if you use skills from far distance you going to 0m and dont use skill
need push it again. Then all time need push skills twice. Same for ranger
skills too.
Original comment by to...@mail.com
on 11 Mar 2011 at 9:45
Can someone else verify that this is actually a Server issue? It sounds like
the same bug retail has.
Original comment by ZeroSign...@gmail.com
on 15 Mar 2011 at 5:14
Dont know how ppl playing with this bugs and not report...
Original comment by to...@mail.com
on 16 Mar 2011 at 5:43
[deleted comment]
my feedback about this :
I have this bug (saying target is too far away) but only in 1 case :
When using auto-move to mob on casting and only 1 times
Example from my gladiator :
- I'm at 20m
- cast the 17m skill : my char approach the mob to 16m, stop, and say it is too
far away
- cast again and the skill work
Now if I move manually to 17m, and the cast the skill : there isn't any problem
This "bug" isn't really a probleme for player like me that spam skill until it
is cast ;)
But It can be a serious pb for those using macro with automove ..
regards
Original comment by simeria2...@gmail.com
on 19 Mar 2011 at 10:42
Original comment by ZeroSign...@gmail.com
on 23 Mar 2011 at 5:10
Original comment by ZeroSign...@gmail.com
on 30 Mar 2011 at 4:40
Some checks in the class Mathui should be done .
Original comment by unkm...@gmail.com
on 25 Jan 2013 at 6:04
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
to...@mail.com
on 7 Mar 2011 at 8:20