When inputting 4 as field bound, the calculator assumes Z_4, which is not a finite field, instead of GF(4), which is.
I would recommend making it explicit that this calculator works with the ring Z_m or adjusting it to properly make use of Galois fields where applicable.
Still, props for showing which elements in the ring Z_m are units.
Thanks for getting back to me! I appreciate the warning, but I would argue one of the key aspects of open source development is being open to feedback.
When inputting
4
as field bound, the calculator assumesZ_4
, which is not a finite field, instead ofGF(4)
, which is.I would recommend making it explicit that this calculator works with the ring
Z_m
or adjusting it to properly make use of Galois fields where applicable.Still, props for showing which elements in the ring
Z_m
are units.