Closed hellovuong closed 2 years ago
Thanks for trying out the code! Could you please send me the folder with the results so I can have a look later today (the name should start with dmvioresult)? (The folder is generated by the python tools and also contains a file setup/setup.yaml which I can use to see which commands were used to run it.)
Thanks for the quick reply. Here is the result folder generated by the scripts
Thanks for sending the results! The configuration looks correct but I'll be only able to evaluate the results in a couple of hours as I'm on my phone right now.
Could you do a full run (with 10 iterations) to see if the difference is up to randomness? As the method is non-deterministic, individual runs can differ a bit, but in my experience the results on EuRoC are quite stable overall.
Sure, I will run 10 iterations now. But I also think It will not make much difference too :))
Close for inactivity
Close for inactivity
Hello, Thank you for the fantastic works. I am able to obtain the very precise result in TUM-VI dataset. However, I got struggle on reproduced the result on EuRoC, sequence MH_04 for specific, (also in OpenLoris datasets), the scale seems bad. I generated the config and run by the python scripts. Do you have any suggest to run it correctly? Thank you in advance!