Closed pr28416 closed 1 year ago
What's so hard to understand about this? You should replace the "hammer" tactic with what is suggested, which is usually some version of sauto/hauto - these are the reconstruction tactics which don't have time limits and don't depend on external ATPs.
Hi,
According to the documentation, "The intended use of the hammer tactic is to replace it upon success with the reconstruction tactic shown in the response window. This reconstruction tactic has no time limits and makes no calls to external ATPs." But when I successfully run sauto, there is no response window output, and when I run hammer, the output often includes a "replace with sauto/hauto" or something similar, which isn't too descriptive of what non-"auto" code might replace the sauto or hammer statement.
Example:
Output:
In this case, shouldn't it instead be the case that one can view non-"auto" code that should replace the "hammer" command, not something that includes "hauto"?