search

lukeme / gobible

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/gobible
1 stars 0 forks source link

Make red letters for Words of Christ a GB user preference rather than a GBC build option. #95

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
A translator has made a good suggestion regarding red letters. 

Instead of making that a GoBibleCreator build option, would it not be
better to make that a GoBible user preferencce? 

In other words, if \wj ... \wj* tags are present (USFM example), encode the
locations of where red letters should be, but show them in red or black,
whichever the reader prefers.

NB. Implementing this would require an extra item in the UI.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by DFH...@gmail.com on 3 Jan 2010 at 3:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by DFH...@gmail.com on 3 Jan 2010 at 3:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
It would be nice to have the changes the require a UI addition be linked 
somehow; as 
it seems there is a growing number of these changes. And in cases like this 
one, the 
code to do it isn't very difficult - but the UI additions is a Huge issue.

Original comment by dhinton...@gmail.com on 6 Jan 2010 at 4:24

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
See my email sent today, which addresses the hurdle of extending the UI.

Original comment by DFH...@gmail.com on 29 Mar 2010 at 9:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Is this an enhancement for 2.4.0?

Original comment by dhinton...@gmail.com on 29 Mar 2010 at 9:42

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Only if done in conjunction with Extended-UI: true
as discussed in detail by private emails.

And only if both these enhancements can be done speedily.
Otherwise, we should tackle this for a future v2.5.0

Original comment by DFH...@gmail.com on 30 Mar 2010 at 9:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
The UI item "Words of Christ in red" should not appear in Preferences if the 
Bibical
text in the JAR file does not contain a single instance of UTF-8 character 0x1.

Otherwise we will get reports from users complaining that they set it "On" and
"Nothing happened".

Original comment by DFH...@gmail.com on 30 Mar 2010 at 3:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by DFH...@gmail.com on 20 Mar 2011 at 10:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Any thoughts on this issue, Daniel?

Original comment by DFH...@gmail.com on 15 Apr 2011 at 3:07

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Any progress on this?

Original comment by DFH...@gmail.com on 12 Aug 2012 at 4:04