Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
And this removes a dependency not in the standard lib, which could be a nice
ambition as well.
Original comment by dhermes@google.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 4:16
Yes, it will also help with the port to Python 3.x since gflags isn't Python
3.x compatible.
Original comment by jcgregorio@google.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 4:20
The big question: is this a large enough change to qualify for a major version
change, i.e. going to 2.0?
Original comment by jcgregorio@google.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 4:50
IMO, no. I feel that our docs suggest safe ways to get the most up to date
version of the code and so having some files out-of-date that rely on gflags is
not likely.
Empirical evidence suggests (to me) that people aren't actively extending the
gflags pieces we use (never seen a thing about it on StackOverflow, never had
any dev ask me about it, etc.), so I don't see it as a (large-ly) breaking
change.
I think an upgrade to 2.0 should only be forced by big changes, such as a
change in an interface that people use to interact with the code.
Original comment by dhermes@google.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 6:07
Maybe we should post to the forum?
Original comment by dhermes@google.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 6:07
Will go out in 1.2.
Original comment by jcgregorio@google.com
on 5 Aug 2013 at 2:02
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jcgregorio@google.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 2:01