Closed RayOnFire closed 2 years ago
me too, forward to your reply
the same problem
Hi Guys, the settings in current our.sh
(addCtagSup is none and addCtagQue is none) is not for our LaSAML-PN model but for those baseline methods. Sorry for the confusions. For the LaSAML-PN result on the Table 2, please run the our.sh
with following settings:
CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0 python src/main.py \
--cuda 0 \
--way 5 \
--shot 1 \
--query 4 \
--mode train \
--embedding ebdnew \
--classifier mbc \
--induct_hidden_dim 50 \
--dataset=$dataset \
--data_path=$data_path \
--n_train_class=$n_train_class \
--n_val_class=$n_val_class \
--n_test_class=$n_test_class \
--n_train_domain=$n_train_domain \
--n_val_domain=$n_val_domain \
--n_test_domain=$n_test_domain \
--bert \
--pretrained_bert $pretrained_bert \
--bert_cache_dir $bert_cache_dir \
--finetune_ebd \
--sup_feature cls \
--que_feature cls \
--lr 2e-5 \
--seed 330 \
--addCtagSup one \
--addCtagQue none \
--notqdm
I will update the readme.md
for more details soon.
Hi, qiaoyang,
Thanks for your excellent work. After reading your paper, I tried to reproduce your experiment by simply running your
our.sh
script, and I got results as the following:which is far worse than the result
0.6216 (from Table 2)
as your paper claimed. I may misunderstand theour.sh
script or did not run it correctly since there is no tutorial inREADME.md
. Therefore, it would be really helpful to me if you can demonstrate how to reproduce your result.Best, Ray