Closed oliverklee closed 7 years ago
If I read this correctly, "2.x" will always point to the latest 2.x.y (starting with Ruby 2.1.0). I'm giving this a try.
At least for 2.4, this does not work. And for 2.2., it looks like the installed Ruby version 2.2.0p0 is too low for Rails 5.0 (which requires Ruby >= 2.2.2).
"2.3" does not work, either.
So it looks like 2.1 is the only version where we can do without a teeny version number.
Too bad, thanks for trying 👍
Are tiny version numbers required? When specifying simply:
what does RVM do? Does it even work? Do they choose the latest tiny version.
Reason I'm asking is, because that way we as a project don't need to keep track of tiny ruby upgrades.