Open sporockel opened 10 years ago
What crash? That lock dependency warning does not interrupt operations. If you do not ewant to see it, turn off lock dependency checking in your kernel.
If I knew what to fix, I would do it; however, I have more important thingd to look after.
ok, it's not a crash, however iw list does not show a wireless interface and I thought it may have to do with the output. Maybe I'm overlooking something.
I do not see anything either.
Which branch of the repo are you running? If you are not using the kernel-version branch, please switch to it.
The only difference I see in your device is that yours is SINGLEMAC_SINGLEPHY while mine is DOUBLEMAC_DOUBLEPHY. That means I have both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz radios, and both can work at the same time. It shouldn't make a difference, but who knows.
it tried both, but there is no difference. I'm going to do further investigations in April, now it's vacation time :-). Thanks for reply
Have a good vacation. When you return, it will be better if you use the keernel-version branch as that is the one I am currently working on.
hi lwfinger.how to compile the kernel-version branch.I have an error when make process.my kernel version is 3.2.0-60-generic
The kernel-version branch is only for kernel 3.14, although 3.13 may work. For old kernels such as 3.0, you must use the master branch!
Oh i see thank you
Hello,
I can confirm with latest kernel-version (#489e933c98f45ca793a995f747282d764c020b5e) the issue is gone.
我也遇到了相同的问题最后解决了,我这边的原因:1.内核抢占模式为Low-Latency Desktop,改为自主强占 2.DEBUG_SPINLOCK需要禁掉,满足1.2才可以实现unlock and unlock_irq functions are inlined,说到底都是因为IO Schedulers不同造成的
I used Google Translate as I do not read Chinese to get the following:
"I also encountered the same problem finally solved, my side of reasons: 1. kernel preemption mode as Low-Latency Desktop, need to customize the seizure 2.DEBUG_SPINLOCK ban to meet before they can achieve 1.2 unlock and unlock_irq functions are inlined in the final analysis are caused because different IO Schedulers"
Sorry, but I do not understand what you are saying. Is there a patch that solves the problem? If so, perhaps I can understand it.
kernel .config patch: @@ -219,7 +214,11 @@ CONFIG_IOSCHED_CFQ=y CONFIG_DEFAULT_CFQ=y
CONFIG_DEFAULT_IOSCHED="cfq" -CONFIG_UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK=y +CONFIG_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ=y +CONFIG_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK=y +CONFIG_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ=y +CONFIG_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK=y +CONFIG_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ=y CONFIG_FREEZER=y
-# CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
-CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
-CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y
+CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
+# CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set
CONFIG_HZ_FIXED=0
Sorry, My English poll. I have found the solution . The issues to be further . I just know the issues to be caused by spinlock.
Hi, I've tried to get a RTL8192Du running on a ARM platform, kernel 3.14.0-rc6. The same with 3.12.0. Any idea where to start searching?