Closed DavisVaughan closed 1 year ago
Thank you so very much for alerting us to this issue --- and taking the time to put together the suggested patch. Our intention is for the na_if()
function to be applied to all columns (and not just numeric as suggested). Therefore, to maintain dplyr
compatibility with your update, we have fixed this issue throughout using:
dataset_na <- DS.data
for (value in na.omit(non.NA.missing.codes)) {
dataset_na <- dataset_na %>%
mutate(across(everything(), ~na_if(.x, value)))
}
Our changes have been submitted to CRAN.
This PR makes your package compatible with the next version of dplyr:
na_if()
now uses vctrs. It previously accidentally allowed you to apply it to an entire data frame at once, but this was never the actual intention of this function, it is meant to be applied to a single column at a time. Applying it to a data frame like this now errors, so I've updated your usage to correctly apply it to only your numeric columns.We plan to submit dplyr 1.1.0 on January 27th.
This should be compatible with both dev and CRAN dplyr. It would help us out if you could go ahead and send a patch version of your package to CRAN ahead of time! Thanks!