search

lwig-wg / protocol-comparison

Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

Comments from Erik Kline: Mention RFC 8824 #27

Closed emanjon closed 1 year ago

emanjon commented 1 year ago

About the actual content, I find it strange that RFC 8824 is not mentioned anywhere (it it about CoAP compression by SCHC)

-éric

emanjon commented 1 year ago

Agree this should be mentioned. SCHC also affect the numbers mentioned for CoAP and UDP overhead.

emanjon commented 1 year ago

Also https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tiloca-lpwan-8824-update/