search

lwig-wg / protocol-comparison

Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

Comment from AKRAM SHERIFF #30

Closed emanjon closed 1 year ago

emanjon commented 1 year ago

Since the EDHOC overhead is dependent on the key identifiers used and included. Is there a need to add and create a separate 'Table' with Sender ID's of different lengths and then analyze the "key size" overhead based on different Tag lengths ?

emanjon commented 1 year ago

This also applies to cTLS I don't think this deserves a separate table.

Added a sentence on how longer key/certificate identifiers would affect the numbers.