search

ly4k / Certipy

Tool for Active Directory Certificate Services enumeration and abuse
MIT License
2.43k stars 338 forks source link

KB5014754 - SID Extension Policy Module #208

Open noraj opened 7 months ago

noraj commented 7 months ago

More details here: How to Add the objectSID Attribute to a Certificate Manually.

Since then, on up-to-date machines, typically trying to exploit ESC8 or ESC11, either I use certipy relay to replay a DC (-template DomainController) or a normal server (-template Machine), I obtain the pfx, but I get a warning Certificate has no object SID. Then trying to use this pfx with certipy auth I get 2 errors: Name mismatch between certificate and user 'edited$' and Verify that the username 'edited$' matches the certificate DNS Host Name: EDITED.acme.local.

Looking at the source code of certipy it's mapped to the error code KDC_ERR_CLIENT_NAME_MISMATCH.

https://github.com/ly4k/Certipy/blob/2780d5361121dd4ec79da3f64cfb1984c4f779c6/certipy/commands/auth.py#L366-L368

Which is also the same error code I get if I directly use gettgtpkinit from impacket (cf. https://github.com/ly4k/Certipy/issues/34#issuecomment-2056908525).

I tried forcing the SID with -sid for certipy relay, I saw it's embedded in the CSR, but still have the same issue with the resulting PFX.

In the Microsoft KB they say that before this KB:

certificate-based authentication would not account for a dollar sign ($) at the end of a machine name.

So as far as I understand it seems focus to prevent machine account being relayed to AD CS for various abuse.

Since it was enforced 5 months ago and certipy was last updated 7 months ago, I wanted to know if someone was successfully able to bypass this restriction since November 2023 using certipy to exploit ESC8 or ESC11 successfully?

I also noticed that the following call to create_csr() was missing alt_sid=self.adcs_relay.sid, I don't know if it's intentional or not.

https://github.com/ly4k/Certipy/blob/2780d5361121dd4ec79da3f64cfb1984c4f779c6/certipy/commands/relay.py#L556-L560

As AD CS is very complex, and I'm far for mastering it, I would appreciate any pointer.

noraj commented 7 months ago

From what I understand in Mandiant - Active Directory Certificate Services: Modern Attack Paths, Mitigations, and Hardening - Section Compatibility Mode, page 11

  1. In the 2nd part, as we generated the certificate after the KB was installed, the SID in the certificate must correspond to the SID of the requested user, except that the SID is empty in the certificate we retrieved from certipy relay.

The Continued Attack Vectors Post KB5014754 chapter is interesting too.