Closed joryirving closed 6 months ago
Thanks for the PR. Did you test it already on a fork? Also, I wonder if we need to add another test for the behavior or not.
I have not tested it, unfortunately. I haven't found the time yet, sorry.
This should then also address #216.
I'm going to follow up with I'm not 100% sure how to test a forked GHA.
@LilDrunkenSmurf You should be able to run the new version with output/print commands in an action targeting your branch with the changes. Maybe try this in your fork (I don't think it's required to release an action to use it):
uses: LilDrunkenSmurf/lychee-action@output-fix
Thanks for the contribution. I merged the changes and they should be live in @master
in a bit.
I plan to do a release of the action very soon. Then we should also have the fix with a proper release version.
Currently it evaluates the first
if [ ! -f "${LYCHEE_TMP}" ]; then
, however it skips the second one that's essentially the same check. This combines them into a single if/else statement so it should start being evaluated.Fixes #214