april_epic QA TEST: Dynamic Decision Dashboard

[ghost]

crossref #2854

Directions for Accessing the Dynamic Decision Dashboard:

MTL_Pivot

1. Navigate to the DEV sim environment
2. Enter the following log in information
   • VA Email: devuser6
   • Password: test123A
3. under world select "test_team"
4. Under Start a Session select "DevModelParameters.xlsx"

---

[ghost]

Reviewed briefly during wk2 2023_apr_epic

@lzim @jamesmrollins @emilymetcalf114 @hthrmarsh

Requirements:

• [x] Remove SP from SP Flow
• [x] Address stock labels overlapping with stock visuals
• [ ] Standard scale for stock diagrams

[hthrmarsh]

@epearman

• [x] Are there specific things we're testing for or just to see that we can login?

[ghost]

@jamesmrollins this was discussed during wk2 2023_apr_epic systyem_sme_workflow

Need the users to be able to use their own Forio Login email & PW to work in the DEV instance of the #sim_ui for these user_workflow

• [ ] #mgmt_trio
• [ ] #systems_sme_workflow
• [ ] #support_workflow

[jamesmrollins]

@lzim @epearman @emilymetcalf114 I don't think it is a good idea to let users into DEV. We are working on the login issue currently, and will move to test slow very soon. Then we can ensure everyone has a login and can conduct testing.

[hthrmarsh]

@epearman I took a look at this and here's some feedback (keep in mind I'm not that familiar with this platform and maybe not the best tester)

• As discussed, we may want to come up with a set of directions for how to test when you get to that stage
• Nothing happens when you click ttAdmin under Site Report
• I clicked all the radio buttons and they seems to change the info in the stocks
• The labels "Experiment Maintenance" and "Team Data Maintenance" aren't intuitive but maybe these are described somewhere or maybe it doesn't matter in the dev space

[jamesmrollins]

@hthrmarsh @epearman

Thanks for taking the time to test the interface.

• [x] You are correct about needing a test guide. Typically, we would produce a test card that has testing instructions on it.
• [x] Site Report is not functional.
• [x] The radio buttons are for variable arrays, so they should change when you click them.
• [ ] The labels for Experiment Maintenance and Team Data Maintenance aren't intuitive - what do you think would make them clearer in your opinion?

[lzim]

Functional Requirement: Align #sim_ui Logins for internal Team PSD Quality Assurance Tests

@jamesmrollins - Following your response to @epearman. If we want to only TEST in TEST. Great!

I'm having a very hard time with my login and password requiring lookup since it does not align in natural opportunities to vet the Dynamic Decision Dashboard.

These were the classes of workflow_users who it made sense to align #sim_ui Forio login/pw across DEV/TEST/PROD.

• [ ] @lzim #pi
• [ ] @hthrmarsh #mgmt_trio
• [ ] @emilymetcalf114 #mgmt_trio
• [ ] @epearman #mgmt_trio
• [ ] @lijenn #support_workflow

[hthrmarsh]

@jamesmrollins

• [ ] The labels for Experiment Maintenance and Team Data Maintenance aren't intuitive - what do you think would make them clearer in your opinion?

I'm not sure. Is there a way to have a little "i" or info button that describes what each of these spaces are?

[ghost]

Update fromwk3 apr_epic 8am_workflow @lzim @jamesmrollins @hthrmarsh @emilymetcalf114

Likely waste and rework for anyone to be thinking they will TEST this until. 

• [ ] @lzim signs off on whether the standardization and scale functional requirements are approved.
• [ ] May need time with David L, David N on this too. 

[lzim]

See above this is for @lzim and @jamesmrollins to review functional requirements

• [ ] standardization
• [ ] scale at wk3 sim_ui_workflow

[ghost]

ajudicate_memo the dynamic decision dashboard is not ready for testing yet, functional requirements still need to be signed off on.

[lijenn]

Closing this card since this work is now tracked in #3029 FYI @ljmoody