add new cli tools to an index

[m-c-frank]

there are so many, i need to find a way to convey the full meaning and potential of a cli in a single line including an example on how to use it. so i can let an llm decide what to do

[m-c-frank]

Method 1: Use a keyword-based index

1. Create an index file with columns for the tool name, description, and example usage.
2. Assign a unique keyword to each tool based on its functionality and purpose.
3. Add each tool to the index by entering its name, description, and example usage.
4. To search for tools, enter relevant keywords in the search bar and retrieve matches from the index. Efficiency: This method is efficient as it requires minimal steps to add new tools to the index and allows for quick searching based on keywords.

Method 2: Categorize tools in the index

1. Create categories or tags representing different tool types or use cases (e.g., File Manipulation, Data Analysis).
2. Assign each tool to one or more categories based on its functionality.
3. Create a separate subsection in the index for each category and list the tools under the relevant section.
4. When adding a new tool, assign it to the appropriate category/tags to ensure easy navigation. Efficiency: Categorizing tools in the index allows users to quickly find the right type of tool without the need for a lengthy description or examples.

Method 3: Use a short tool summary with links to more information

1. Create a concise summary for each tool, including its name, key features, and potential use cases.
2. Include a hyperlink or reference to additional documentation or examples for each tool.
3. Instead of providing example usage directly in the index, refer users to the more detailed information for each tool. Efficiency: This method reduces the need for lengthy descriptions within the index itself and allows users to explore the full potential of each tool at their own pace.

Method 4: Utilize a ranking system based on popularity or usefulness

1. Create a ranking system for the tools in the index, either based on their popularity within the user community or their perceived usefulness.
2. Add a popularity or usefulness score alongside each tool in the index.
3. Prioritize and display the tools with the highest score at the top of the index. Efficiency: By ranking the tools, users can quickly identify the most valuable or frequently used ones without having to read through the entire index.

Method 5: Provide a simple filtering option

1. Add a filtering feature to the index, allowing users to refine their search based on specific criteria.
2. Include filters such as tool type, language compatibility, or required dependencies.
3. Users can apply filters to narrow down the list of tools that match their requirements. Efficiency: Offering filtering options reduces the time needed to find the appropriate tools by eliminating irrelevant options, enabling users to quickly identify the most suitable ones.

[m-c-frank]

im thinking more like having three levels of abstraction and then the ground truth. so the ground truth is a bash script that does something, the first order abstraction is the help menu of the tool, the second order abstraction is examples of whats possible with this tool in just one or two tweets and the third order abstraction is like a one line abstract. the goal is to increase information density in every abstraction.

[m-c-frank]

we can start with this github repository serving as the toolkit to improve itself using large language models and actions that i have defined.

[m-c-frank]

okay i will now create an actionindex.md for this repository where the relevant tools will be listed