m-labs / artiq

A leading-edge control system for quantum information experiments
https://m-labs.hk/artiq
GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0
437 stars 201 forks source link

Allaki in slots 3 and 4 are not working #919

Closed sbourdeauducq closed 6 years ago

sbourdeauducq commented 6 years ago
gkasprow commented 6 years ago

@sbourdeauducq could be also a problem with FPGA pin assignment in some of the slots. I tested Allaki operation on all boards except for very first 2 prototypes where Allaki were not available. Can you test if the signal is missing after the amplifier? You need to solder a piece of wire to access it. Another issue could be with migen - I observed that one signal declared LOW was high on some boards. When it was register controlled, the problem disappeared. Looks like Vivado optimised it somehow.

sbourdeauducq commented 6 years ago

Another issue could be with migen - I observed that one signal declared LOW was high on some boards. When it was register controlled, the problem disappeared. Looks like Vivado optimised it somehow.

You have interesting ideas of what to blame and what to praise. In my book, if Vivado generates a logic low from assign allaki3_rfsw1 = 1'd1; (which is what Migen generates), it is called a "Vivado bug", not a "Vivado optimization" or an "issue with Migen". What signal was it, exactly?

gkasprow commented 6 years ago

@sbourdeauducq I didn't look where the problem happened. I tested binaries only. Could be either migen or Vivado. That's true, my statement was not precise :) In vivado you can have mixture of settings that treat differently such statements so it may not be a bug. I described the issue here

sbourdeauducq commented 6 years ago

In vivado you can have mixture of settings that treat differently such statements

Where? Anyway all the statements generated by Migen to set outputs to fixed levels are the same, and they are compiled with the same Vivado options.

gkasprow commented 6 years ago

I didn't play with them, my colleague (@wzab) told me that once had similar case in the past. And it was some option to change the compiler behaviour. But anyway, there is certainly an issue with this Artix chip, at least with one of the pins. To check it, route the pins that you want to bind to vcc/gnd to the register and write the value you want to have. This solved the issue in my case.

jbqubit commented 6 years ago

there is certainly an issue with this Artix chip

Is this reproducible in a stand alone bit of VHDL? Does @gkasprow approach work?

whitequark commented 6 years ago

I've compared migen pin assignment with schematics and everything matches.

jbqubit commented 6 years ago

@sbourdeauducq Did you try to trick that @gkasprow suggested on Feb 9? What is scope of IO error for Slots 3 and 4? Single IO line or all the IO lines?

whitequark commented 6 years ago

@jbqubit I'm working on this. I will check that tomorrow or the next day; so far I've not been able to get any output from DACs whatsoever because of serwb hangs.

sbourdeauducq commented 6 years ago

I've not been able to get any output from DACs whatsoever because of serwb hangs.

Even with the AMC/RTM combination that I had working? (Florent's AMC, and RTM with the resistor in DAC_CLK_N) As with everything in Sayma, there is a lot of board-to-board variation...

whitequark commented 6 years ago

Even with the AMC/RTM combination that I had working? (Florent's AMC, and RTM with the resistor in DAC_CLK_N)

On that board I got past JESD initialization (unlike with the other AMC), but I think it still hung somewhere.

sbourdeauducq commented 6 years ago

Also I wonder if the RTM connector sometimes make poor contact.

whitequark commented 6 years ago

What's the point in that complicated expensive connector if it doesn't even work well?

sbourdeauducq commented 6 years ago

I'm not sure if it's really a source of problems, just something to check - sometimes, problems disappeared when reconnecting the rtm, but it could have been just chance.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Although that reminds me that we should fit the guide pun to the boards. @gkasprow can you post one for each Sayma?

gkasprow commented 6 years ago

I assembled them on most of the boards. I still have one or two pieces in my lab. Who else is missing the guiding pun?

jbqubit commented 6 years ago

@gkasprow I'm missing the AMC-side (female) pun on one board.

sbourdeauducq commented 6 years ago

@whitequark I suspect your problems are due to incompatible or outdated RTM gateware. I just updated everything and it worked. The RTM gateware that you had loaded into the board was quite old.

[     0.000006s]  INFO(runtime): ARTIQ runtime starting...
[     0.003887s]  INFO(runtime): software version 4.0.dev+803.gf0771765
[     0.010154s]  INFO(runtime): gateware version 4.0.dev+803.gf0771765
[     0.016424s]  INFO(runtime): log level set to INFO by default
[     0.022134s]  INFO(runtime): UART log level set to INFO by default
[     0.028286s]  INFO(board_artiq::serwb): waiting for AMC/RTM serwb bridge to be ready...
[     0.504989s]  INFO(board_artiq::serwb): done.
[     0.508113s]  INFO(board_artiq::serwb): RTM gateware version 4.0.dev+803.gf0771765
[     0.515581s]  INFO(runtime): press 'e' to erase startup and idle kernels...
[     1.515007s]  INFO(runtime): continuing boot
[     1.518022s]  INFO(board_artiq::hmc830_7043::hmc7043): HMC7043 found
[     1.524288s]  INFO(board_artiq::hmc830_7043::hmc7043): HMC7043 configuration...
[     1.542751s]  INFO(board_artiq::ad9154): AD9154-0 found
[     1.546670s]  INFO(board_artiq::ad9154): AD9154-0 configuration...
[     1.629690s]  INFO(board_artiq::ad9154): AD9154-0 PRBS test
[     2.644680s]  INFO(board_artiq::ad9154): AD9154-0 found
[     2.648590s]  INFO(board_artiq::ad9154): AD9154-0 configuration...
[     2.741913s]  INFO(board_artiq::ad9154): AD9154-1 found
[     2.745830s]  INFO(board_artiq::ad9154): AD9154-1 configuration...
[     2.828846s]  INFO(board_artiq::ad9154): AD9154-1 PRBS test
[     3.843844s]  INFO(board_artiq::ad9154): AD9154-1 found
[     3.847754s]  INFO(board_artiq::ad9154): AD9154-1 configuration...
[     3.946633s]  WARN(runtime): using default MAC address 02-00-00-00-00-01; consider changing it
[     3.954106s]  INFO(runtime): using IP address 192.168.1.60
[     3.959673s] ERROR(runtime::rtio_mgt): unrecognized startup_clock configuration entry, using internal RTIO clock
[     3.971213s]  INFO(runtime::mgmt): management interface active
[     3.984428s]  INFO(runtime::session): accepting network sessions
[     3.998651s]  INFO(runtime::session): running startup kernel
[     4.003168s]  INFO(runtime::session): no startup kernel found
[     4.008866s]  INFO(runtime::session): no connection, starting idle kernel
[     4.015745s]  INFO(runtime::session): no idle kernel found

@hartytp @gkasprow @jbqubit this issue is not the place to discuss unrelated hardware supplies.

whitequark commented 6 years ago

@sbourdeauducq No, I've built the gateware for the master branch at the time when I was testing after you told me that it was too old. Seems like random breakage.

sbourdeauducq commented 6 years ago

Problem is not consistent, https://github.com/sinara-hw/sinara/issues/536#issuecomment-377556508 @whitequark Have you reproduced it?

whitequark commented 6 years ago

@sbourdeauducq Maybe I'm doing something wrong but I can't see any output from DACs right now.

whitequark commented 6 years ago

I confirm that on M-Labs Sayma 3 all eight DAC channels have sawtooth output on both P and N SMPs.

jbqubit commented 6 years ago

@whitequark Great! Can you also set RF attenuators and switchs?

whitequark commented 6 years ago

@jbqubit It was too late to check that today, I plan to do it tomorrow.

sbourdeauducq commented 6 years ago

@whitequark Any update? When I reported this issue I wanted to have one Allaki on the first DAC chip and another on the second DAC chip, to test DAC synchronization. Are you able to get outputs from both DACs using two Allaki?

whitequark commented 6 years ago

Not yet.

jbqubit commented 6 years ago

@whitequark What exactly are the steps you've done to test on your board?

sbourdeauducq commented 6 years ago

@whitequark ping.

jbqubit commented 6 years ago

@whitequark Have you tried RF switches and attenuators?

whitequark commented 6 years ago

@jbqubit Right now there is the problem that the clock generator we have been using in the lab died, so I'm figuring out how to set up NVSynth.

jbqubit commented 6 years ago

There's a serial interface... https://windfreaktech.com/wp-content/uploads/docs/synthnv/serialcomm.pdf

watch out for large power in harmonics for these synths

whitequark commented 6 years ago

I've flashed an old firmware that has been proven to work some weeks ago built based on hashes I recorded then. I've tried using two other Sayma RTMs (and ensured the proper resistor is soldered to DAC_CLK_N). I've tried different cables. I've tried using NVSynth instead of our clock generator (which appears to not have died after all, it does output RF at frequencies I can check with a scope here). I've tried skipping DAC0 and starting with initializing DAC1.

None of this seems to make any difference, the AD9154 SERDES PLL just doesn't lock. What are the next steps? Do the AD9154 registers offer any insight into why it doesn't lock?

sbourdeauducq commented 6 years ago

Works for me with the hardware in whatever state you left it. I guess you are not setting the clock switches correctly. Use this patch:

diff --git a/artiq/firmware/libboard_artiq/hmc830_7043.rs b/artiq/firmware/libboard_artiq/hmc830_7043.rs
index 44bf0f967..a9fe589b7 100644
--- a/artiq/firmware/libboard_artiq/hmc830_7043.rs
+++ b/artiq/firmware/libboard_artiq/hmc830_7043.rs
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ mod clock_mux {
             csr::clock_mux::out_write(
                 1*CLK_SRC_EXT_SEL |  // use ext clk from sma
                 1*REF_CLK_SRC_SEL |
-                1*DAC_CLK_SRC_SEL);
+                0*DAC_CLK_SRC_SEL);
         }
     }
 }
@@ -254,6 +254,6 @@ mod hmc7043 {
 pub fn init() -> Result<(), &'static str> {
     clock_mux::init();
     /* must be the first SPI init because of HMC830 SPI mode selection */
-    hmc830::init()?;
+    //hmc830::init()?;
     hmc7043::init()
 }

This is ARTIQ f96f597e.

jbqubit commented 6 years ago

and ensured the proper resistor is soldered to DAC_CLK_N)

I'm not using a resistor on my boards. I use a 180-deg power splitter and simultaneously drive DAC_CLK_N and DAC_CLK_P with +10 dBm from my synth. But resistor should work fine too.

jbqubit commented 6 years ago

@whitequark What's the status of this?

whitequark commented 6 years ago

@jbqubit Today I've determined that on master, even if AD9154 is initialized (and it gets initialized with @sbourdeauducq's patch that correctly sets up the mux), there is no sawtooth output. I was going to rebuild the commit I initially tested this with and check if that works, but Sayma 3 was busy and I left the lab before it got too late. Will continue tomorrow.

whitequark commented 6 years ago

I've checked with the commit that used to work. RTMs "1" and "2" lock and there is just 3V at the DAC SMPs. RTM "F" does not lock. This happens with either clock generator.

enjoy-digital commented 6 years ago

@whitequark: if RTM "F" is the board i had before, the first AD9154 is not working. (hardware patch missing?). Only the second one works. (To test with ARTIQ i was changing this: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/blob/master/artiq/firmware/libboard_artiq/ad9154.rs#L615 to start at 1).

sbourdeauducq commented 6 years ago

@whitequark: if RTM "F" is the board i had before,

Yes, it's that one.

jbqubit commented 6 years ago

@whitequark Do you get output from the other DAC? Sawtooth? SAWG?

if RTM "F" is the board i had before, the first AD9154 is not working. (hardware patch missing?)

Please attach a label to the board noting that the DAC is not functioning to prevent confusion. And so it makes its way eventually back to WUT for repair.

whitequark commented 6 years ago

@jbqubit I did not see any output from any of the DACs on any of the RTMs.

jbqubit commented 6 years ago

Did you check all three Sayma at M-Labs? What do you see on the terminal?

whitequark commented 6 years ago

As I've said, I checked all three RTMs. The terminal output indicates that AD9154 was initialized correctly on RTMs "1" and "2", and PRBS test passed.

gkasprow commented 6 years ago

Are you sure that the wires that supply termination voltages are OK? I tested all DACs prior shipment...

whitequark commented 6 years ago

@gkasprow I used to get the expected output from DACs before, so it's not your fault, it's something else.

sbourdeauducq commented 6 years ago

Tested it again today, got output from slots 1 and 3 using Allaki. Joe also got output on most channels: https://github.com/sinara-hw/sinara/issues/536#issuecomment-377556508

Closing this.