search

m-meliani / cpacs

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/cpacs
0 stars 0 forks source link

Why is this specific definition only present under wing and fuselage? Isn't this only valid for very specific purposes in the form of aeroelastic calculations, or maybe even very software specific? #321

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Occurs in xPath: 
/cpacs/vehicles/aircraft/model/wings/wing/dynamicaircraftmodel 
/cpacs/vehicles/aircraft/model/fuselages/fuselage/dynamicaircraftmodel

Problem/Question: 
Why is this specific definition only present under wing and fuselage? Isn't 
this only valid for very specific purposes in the form of aeroelastic 
calculations, or maybe even very software specific?

Reply: 
maybe put this under analysis within each component

daniel.boehnke@dlr.de

Original issue reported on code.google.com by daniel.b...@googlemail.com on 25 Jan 2012 at 10:57

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by daniel.b...@googlemail.com on 8 Feb 2012 at 9:46

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
For CPACS 2.0 This will stay the way it is. However, we should dicuss on 
analysis and global entries for components.

Original comment by daniel.b...@googlemail.com on 27 Feb 2012 at 12:16

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by daniel.b...@googlemail.com on 16 Apr 2013 at 9:42

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Dynamic Aircraft Model is necessary for an exchange of information in during 
the loads process. The overall loads process may change during the definition 
of CPACS 2.2 but the DAM will probably remain intact

Original comment by daniel.b...@googlemail.com on 19 Feb 2014 at 4:10