Objective: Determine if database access should use vector operations exclusively and evaluate saving graph data via GraphQL calls.
Duration: 3-5 days
Steps:
Research Supabase and Vector Operations
Study Supabase documentation and capabilities
Investigate vector operations in database contexts
Understand pros and cons of vector-based access
Evaluate GraphQL Integration
Review GraphQL implementation with Supabase
Assess methods for saving graph data via GraphQL calls
Prototype Development
Create a small proof-of-concept application
Implement vector operations for data access
Test GraphQL calls for saving graph data
Performance Testing
Benchmark vector operations vs. traditional queries
Measure GraphQL call efficiency for graph data storage
Analysis and Recommendation
Compile findings from research and prototyping
Develop a recommendation for the optimal approach
Deliverables:
Technical summary of findings
Prototype demonstrating vector operations and GraphQL integration
Performance comparison results
Recommendation report for database access strategy
Key Questions to Answer:
What advantages do vector operations offer for our specific use case?
How does vector-based access impact query performance and scalability?
What are the trade-offs between vector-only and hybrid access approaches?
How efficiently can we save and retrieve graph data using GraphQL calls?
What are the implications for our existing data models and access patterns?
This spike will provide valuable insights to inform the decision on whether to adopt a vector-only approach for database access and how to effectively integrate GraphQL for graph data management.
Objective: Determine if database access should use vector operations exclusively and evaluate saving graph data via GraphQL calls.
Duration: 3-5 days
Steps:
Deliverables:
Key Questions to Answer:
This spike will provide valuable insights to inform the decision on whether to adopt a vector-only approach for database access and how to effectively integrate GraphQL for graph data management.