Closed raehik closed 1 year ago
Some problems addressed here are a result of attempting to onboard @MarionBWeinzierl .
@MarionBWeinzierl thx for the review. Clarified on most of the points you made. Some areas like memory usage/runtime and stage configuration I don't have enough insight on: in most cases I add a little bit of info to the readme, and where I don't know what to add I've provided context in the review comments.
With proper GH reviews, does the reviewer have to re-review after requesting changes? Simply marking all comments as resolved doesn't seem to change review status.
Thanks a lot, @raehik . Yes, just click the circle-arrow next to my name in the reviewer field, that will re-request the review.
The readme is in a bit of a state with lots of commands pointing to non-present files or incorrect URLs. Certain points like the dataset being stored in a Requester Pays GCP bucket went unexplained. This changeset replaces the readme for better clarity.
Slurm commands/notes are moved to a deprecated docs file, since we don't have the Slurm job scripts in this repo.
Some changes are already present in #50 , #54 . They will need rebasing after this merges.